Emergent Gravity

From Quantum Decoherence to Spacetime Geometry

A Multi-Agent Cognitive Architecture Exploration

The Central Thesis

"Gravity is not fundamental. It emerges from quantum mechanics through the irreversible process of decoherence."

This research program explores a radical hypothesis: Einstein's field equations arise naturally when quantum systems decohere through interaction with vacuum fluctuations. The transverse-traceless (TT) sector of gravitational perturbations — the only physical, propagating degrees of freedom — emerges from Lindblad dynamics.

The Complete Derivation Chain

QM + Causal Order Process Tensors Lindblad Dynamics TT Projection Ward Identities General Relativity

Lorentz invariance emerges as an IR attractor — selected, not assumed

The Decoherence Rate
ΓTT ~ (GM²/ℏc) · ω₀ · Q² · f(Δx/R)

Where geometry matters: spheres don't couple to vacuum fluctuations (monopole = 0), but elongated objects like rods and needles have strong quadrupole coupling.

The Theoretical Framework

Lindblad Dynamics

Open quantum systems evolve via the Lindblad master equation. The jump operators encode how the environment "measures" the system.

dρ/dt = -i[H,ρ] + Σ LkρLk† - ½{Lk†Lk, ρ}

TT Sector Selection

Only transverse-traceless modes carry physical gravitational information. Constraint modes (scalar, vector) are gauge artifacts that don't propagate.

hijTT : ∂ihij = 0, hii = 0

Geometry Dependence

The multipole moment Q determines coupling strength. Shape encodes how strongly an object "feels" vacuum fluctuations.

Q₂(rod) ≈ 1 - 2(d/L)²

The Frequency Scale

A key result: the characteristic frequency is set by the light-crossing time of the object:

ω₀ = c/R

This emerges naturally from the bath spectral density — the only dimensionally consistent choice without fine-tuning.

Lorentz Invariance: Selected, Not Assumed

Lorentz invariance is not put in by hand — it emerges as an IR attractor under RG flow.

  • LV operators are irrelevant or have negative β-function
  • Interactions universalize the speed of light
  • Non-Lorentz worlds require fine-tuning of 10-20

βLV < 0 → Lorentz violation flows to zero in IR

Causal Order is Fundamental

Time and space are both emergent from a deeper structure — causal order encoded in process tensors.

  • Time = continuum limit of causal slot counting
  • Space = correlation decay structure
  • Lorentzian signature from KMS condition

"Who can affect whom" → spacetime geometry

Research Findings

14 documents generated through CAWM tree search, exploring emergent gravity from multiple angles.

01

Emergent Tensor Gravity

Derivation of the TT sector from Lindblad dynamics. Shows how gravitational waves emerge from quantum decoherence.

Key: Jump operators couple to stress-energy quadrupole
02

Nonlinear GR Emergence

Ward identities ensure the emergent theory satisfies diffeomorphism invariance — Einstein's equations arise automatically.

Key: Symmetry protection from Lindblad structure
03

TT Measurement Channel

Explicit derivation of how the vacuum "measures" matter configurations via TT gravitational modes.

Key: Projection onto TT sector is physical
04

Necessity vs Contingency

Counterexample analysis: can gravity emerge differently? Explores uniqueness of the Lindblad route.

Key: TT emergence is robust but not unique
05

Lorentz Invariance Infection

Theorem proving Lorentz symmetry of emergent gravity follows from microscopic constraints.

Key: Symmetry "infects" from UV to IR
06

Lorentz from Quantum

Detailed mechanism: how relativistic invariance emerges from non-relativistic quantum mechanics.

Key: Bath correlations encode c
07

Microscopic Time & Causality

How causal order emerges from timeless quantum mechanics through decoherence.

Key: Decoherence defines the arrow of time
08

Large-N CFT Completion

Newton's constant G is computed from bath parameters: G = 4π/λ²N². Heating and drag vanish by Lorentz symmetry.

Key: G derived, not assumed
09

Background Independence

Two-level dictionary showing how background-free quantum gravity maps to emergent spacetime.

Key: No fixed background required
10

Quantum Noise Witnesses

Sphere vs dumbbell test: spheres (monopole) don't decohere gravitationally. Quantum correlations can be negative — impossible for classical noise.

Key: τspheredumbbell ≫ 1
11

Robustness Audit

EFT deformation analysis: how stable is the framework under perturbations?

Key: Protected by symmetry structure
12

Dimensional Reconstruction

Rate formula derivation with correct dimensional analysis: ω₀ = c/R emerges uniquely.

Key: No free parameters
13

Red-Team Review

Adversarial analysis of the framework. Stress-testing assumptions and identifying weak points.

Key: Magnitude barrier identified

The Magnitude No-Go Theorem

A rigorous proof that direct quantum vacuum coupling is too weak — motivating the search for Framework C.

Theorem (Magnitude No-Go)

For any biological system at temperature T ≥ 273 K:

ΓTT / Γthermal < 10⁻⁸

No amplification mechanism consistent with the TT framework can close this gap.

Step 1: Gravitational Coupling

ObjectMass (kg)(M/MP
Mesoscopic probe10⁻⁴2 × 10⁻⁸
Biological cell10⁻¹²2 × 10⁻²⁴
Protein complex10⁻²²2 × 10⁻⁴⁴

Step 2: Frequency Scale

ObjectSize Rω₀ (Hz)
Mesoscopic probe0.3 mm10¹²
Cell10 μm3 × 10¹³
Protein10 nm3 × 10¹⁶

Signal vs Noise

Direct Vacuum Coupling ~10⁴ Hz
vs
Thermal Decoherence (310K) ~10¹³ Hz
SNR ≈ 5 × 10⁻¹⁰ — Direct coupling buried in thermal noise. A bridge is needed.

Can Direct Coupling Be Salvaged?

Geometry?

Q² ≤ 1 for any shape. Geometry alone cannot close the gap.

No

Collective Effects?

N² scaling needs 10⁸ coherent elements — impractical at room temperature.

No

Resonance?

Q-factors ~10 in warm systems. Thermal broadening kills enhancement.

No

But What If We Build a Bridge?

The No-Go theorem closes one door — but opens another question: can we unify Framework A (quantum vacuum) and Framework B (classical electrostatics) into a single theory where both are limiting cases?

A subsequent tree search was given the ambitious task of constructing Framework C — a mechanistic bridge requiring no new particles, using known physics, that solves the magnitude problem.

Result: Score 10.0/10 — The bridge was built.

Explore Framework C →

CAWM Architecture

Cognitive Agent with World Model — the multi-agent tree search system that generated these findings.

S Scientist
M Mathematician
A Architect
P Philosopher
V Visionary
I Integrator
Sh Shaman
Dao
Orchestrator
1

Branch Generation

Each agent proposes 3 solution branches based on their expertise

2

Voting

All agents score branches; highest-voted branch is selected

3

Review

Critical review may trigger backtrack for breadth exploration

4

Iteration

Repeat until target score (10.0) reached or depth limit

Tree Search Statistics

19 Iterations
17 Max Depth
10.0 Final Score
5 Backtracks