An open investigation into gravity

Gravity, with
no dark disc.

The vertical pull near the Sun rules out every local modified-gravity law. What survives is a response to the mass a galaxy encloses, plus a memory set at formation.

Monopolar response · Formation memory · Soft-glass microphysics

Where we stand

One hard empirical result, one coherent picture, and one decisive test still ahead. The Milky Way's vertical potential excludes any law that amplifies the local field, by a factor of 10 to 40 in χ². A response tied to the enclosed spherical mass, with a formation memory, passes the galactic and Solar-System data. Its microscopic reading is a soft glass of the de Sitter vacuum. This is a real constraint and a consistent model, not a confirmed discovery: no risky prediction has yet been verified, and several failures remain.

If you have one minute

Galaxies spin too fast for the matter we see. The usual answer is invisible matter; another is that gravity itself changes at very small accelerations. This site tests the second idea against measurements and finds it can only work in one specific form: the extra pull must follow the whole mass a galaxy encloses, never the local field, and it must switch off around anything that was born dense, like the Sun. That form passes every test we could run, fails on the faintest dwarf galaxies, and will face its decisive test in December 2026, when Gaia measures very wide pairs of stars. Nothing here is a discovery; it is a hypothesis with its numbers and its obituary conditions on the table. Unfamiliar words are in the glossary.

For the specialist, in one line

gobs = gbar + (ν(gsph/a₀) − 1) gsph with gsph = GMb(<r)/r², McGaugh ν, a₀ = cH₀/2π unfitted, applied only to systems that collapsed at g < a₀: SPARC 0.138 dex, Milky-Way vertical potential χ² 207 vs 125 (halo) and 2983 (QUMOND), Q₂ = 2.5×10−31 s−2, wide binaries Newtonian at all separations; inherits MOND's failures on ultra-faint dwarfs, clusters and the CMB; relativistic completion borrowed from AeST; microphysics a soft glass, exploratory.

10–40×Local laws miss the vertical potential
0.138 dexSPARC rotation-curve scatter
cH₀/2πOrigin of the scale a₀
×10⁴Cassini margin, Solar System

The argument, in three steps

From a null result
to a specific model.

Each step is a measurement or a calculation you can inspect, not an assumption. The first is the one that removes most of the field.

01 / THE NO-GO

No phantom disc.

Any local law g=f(gN) puts extra pull in the Galactic plane. The measured vertical potential wants a rounded halo instead. Local laws miss it by χ² 1000–3000 against 65–125 for a halo.

02 / THE RESPONSE

Answer to the enclosed mass.

Let the extra pull follow the spherical field of the mass a system encloses, not the local field. No disc, no effect around a single star, and the galactic rotation curves are kept.

03 / THE MEMORY

Set at birth.

A system born dense (a star cluster, the Solar System) locks its medium and stays Newtonian; one born diffuse (a galaxy) responds. One rule sorts Pal 14 from the dwarf galaxies.

A picture you can hold

The Sun, an atom trapped
in an inclusion.

The medium is a glassy solid everywhere. In a galaxy most of its elements still have slack and the medium responds; where a star was born, the medium that collapsed with the natal core was strained past its slack and stays fully engaged. The Sun sits inside such a pocket, which is why the Solar System is Newtonian.

FLUID MEDIUM · MOND response ENGAGED POCKET · Newtonian · natal-core size
Inside the pocket the response is Newtonian; outside, the medium that still has slack gives the galactic effect. The pocket is the medium that was bound to the natal core, 0.05 to 0.4 parsec depending on the core's mass. Wide binaries are Newtonian at every separation; there is no edge to find (see Black holes).

Two ways in

Read it your way.

The same pages serve two readers. Each page opens with a plain-words box and ends with what would break it.

Curious, no physics background

Start with The vacuum for the idea, then First black holes for what it would change in the early Universe, then Observations for the test that decides. Skip the equations; the boxes and the tables carry the story.

Astronomer or physicist

Go to Results for the vertical-potential no-go, The model for the law and the memory rule, Methods & data for the Hamiltonian, then Black holes for the limits: entropy, glass physics, the LIGO bounds and general relativity reread.

Status

Solid, speculative, withdrawn.

Three grades, used consistently across the site.

  • Solid (a calculation on public data, reproducible): the no-go of local laws on the vertical potential; the monopolar law's fits to SPARC, DiskMass, HI flaring and the Solar System; the Pal 14 / dwarf-galaxy sorting; the S2 bound on the bath; the LIGO bound on any wave-carrying lattice; the lack of dependence of a₀ on galaxy history.measured
  • Speculative (coherent, not derived): the soft-glass microphysics and its memory; a₀ from Unruh = de Sitter; the viscoelastic after-image; the early-Universe predictions on the first stars and heavy seeds; the reading of general relativity as lattice elasticity.conjecture
  • Withdrawn (was on this site, killed by a later calculation): the occlusion edge at 0.15–0.3 pc; the fluid galactic medium; the horizon as a tear and the shell without singularity; spacetime as the medium.retracted

The sky sets the test.

The vertical potential, SPARC rotation curves, Cassini and the wide binaries of Gaia DR4.

The calculations